The Speakers Lobby
  • The Great Schism of 2009

     

    Perhaps it’s fitting that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) co-hosted a luncheon at the Capitol this week to honor Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew.

     

    Bartholomew leads the Eastern Orthodox Church. The Eastern Orthodox Church split from the Roman Catholic Church during The Great Schism of 1054. It’s one of the greatest divides in religious history.

     

    House Democrats want to debate and pass their massive health care reform bill this weekend. And the rifts between House Democrats are so deep that this could be called The Great Schism of 2009.

     

    Republicans spent most of Thursday excoriating the health care bill on the West Front of the Capitol. At least they were discussing health care policy. That’s because Democrats were talking about everything but health care in an effort to lug the behemoth legislation across the finish line. The off-stage discussions focused on the fissures that plague both political parties: abortion and immigration. And that’s to say nothing of a little-known issue involving something called “black liquor.”

     

    Let’s start with abortion.

     

    More than 190 House Democrats are members of the “pro-choice” caucus. However, there are just enough conservative Democrats who oppose abortion to blow up the bill on the floor.

     

    “We knew there would be a flashpoint,” said Rep. Lois Capps (D-CA), who tried to bridge an impasse between pro-life and pro-choice Democrats. “(Abortion) would become a major detraction. We don’t want this bill clouded.”

     

    Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) is one of the chief architects of the bill. He insists that the legislation does not allow anyone to use federal dollars to pay for abortions. But many anti-abortion Democrats demanded even stronger language in exchange for their support on the bill. Rep. Brad Ellsworth (D-IN) propounded an idea that explicitly outlaws tax dollars from paying for abortions. Ellsworth also asked for guarantees that abortion opponents always have access to a pro-life health insurance plan. Ellsworth’s proposal also makes permanent the “Hyde Amendment.” The Hyde Amendment is a measure that bans the federal funding of abortions. But Congress must reauthorize it every year. Ellsworth wants the Hyde Amendment extended to the life of the health care bill.

     

    But despite his quest, many pro-life groups lobbed epithets at Ellsworth and accused him of selling out just to help pass the health care bill.

     

    “I know what’s in my heart. I know what’s in my head,” Ellsworth said. “And I think the Guy upstairs knows where I am.”

     

    Then there was immigration.

     

    Members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) huddled at the White House mid-week to voice their concerns that the bill could have pernicious effects on illegal immigrants.

     

    Again, House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman argued that the package had firewalls to ensure that undocumented persons would have no access to subsidies to purchase health insurance. But Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL) argued that illegal immigrants would still fall in the crosshairs. Gutierrez said that some low-income, undocumented workers would be in a bind. That’s because they would be unable to purchase health coverage and be ineligible for government assistance. So Gutierrez suggested that many illegal immigrants would wind up precisely where they go now for medical care: the emergency room.

     

    “It costs the American taxpayers money!” thundered Gutierrez about his prediction. “What other knife do you want me to plunge into my heart?”

     

    In the end, the CHC stood down after pleading with Democratic leaders to not tighten up provisions against illegal immigrants. CHC members were fine with refusing subsidies for coverage. But they breathed a temporary sigh of relief that the legislation would not deny undocumented persons access to the health care program even if they paid their own way.

     

    “I think we’re all there,” said former CHC Chairman Joe Baca (D-CA). “We’ve come to a common ground.”

     

    And then there was “black liquor.”
    This is not a reference to Johnnie Walker scotch. Nor “Jagermeister,” as a colleague suggested.

     

    At 10:28 pm on Tuesday night, House Democrats unveiled a 42-page “manager’s amendment.” That’s the final alteration lawmakers make to a bill before bringing it to the floor. Lawmakers devoted seven pages of the manager’s amendment to something called “Second Generation Biofuel Producer Credit.” Which involves “black liquor.”

     

    Black liquor is a byproduct produced in making paper. Some paper plants use it as an alternative fuel.

     

    The manager’s amendment strikes a biofuel tax credit used by pulp and paper firms. The government saves $24 billion by eliminating the credit. That’s desperately needed revenue to help offset the cost of the health plan.

     

    Meantime, those involved in agriculture asked why the manager’s amendment went into exhaustive detail defining “qualified feedstock.”

     

    For the record, the manager’s amendment designates “qualified feedstock” as “any lignocellulosic or hemicelluosic matter that is available on a renewable or recurring basis or any cultivated algae, cyanobacteria or lemna.”

     

    All spelled out in a health care bill.

     

    Meantime, there was grousing from Republicans that they didn’t know what was in the bill.

     

    No Republican lawmakers were expected to vote for the package. But Republicans carped that there wasn’t enough time to read through the bill. Even though Democrats met a demand to unveil the 1,990-page legislation last week. That was ahead of a voluntary commitment Democrats made to present the legislation at least 72 hours before a debate.

     

    In fact, it could be argued that lawmakers even got a “73rd” hour to leaf through the legislation, since Democrats dropped the bill before clocks reverted to Standard Time after a summer of Daylight Saving Time last weekend.

     

    Republicans contend the bill is “government-mandated health care.” Of course, some could say that “falling back” is part of a government-mandated time.

     

    Congress passed the Standard Time Act in 1918. The law first established Daylight Saving Time. I’m told that in 1918 everyone was informed that they could choose the time they wanted it to be. But detractors remained unmoved. They warned that passing the Standard Time Act would put the U.S. on a “Canadian-style” time system controlled by the government.

     

    On Friday afternoon, the Democratic leadership fished around for votes. Moderate Rep. John Tanner (D-TN) declared he would vote no. And Reps. John Adler (D-NJ) and Michael McMahon (D-NY) jumped ship as well. Both are first-term lawmakers who represent districts which swung from Republican to Democratic in 2008.

     

    But it was elections that helped House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-NY) pocket a couple of new votes. On Tuesday, voters elected two Democrats to the House in special elections: Rep. John Garamendi (D-CA) and Rep. Bill Owens (D-NY). Garamendi and Pelosi have known each other for decades. And in one of his first acts in Congress, Garamendi told reporters that he learned long ago never to count Pelosi out.

     

    Garamendi said years ago Pelosi’s family was driving to a picnic at Garamendi’s home when their car missed a curve and flipped over. No one was hurt.

     

    “She brushed her kids off, called for a new car and arrived about 45 minutes late,” Garamendi said. “This is one determined woman.”

     

    And House Democratic Caucus Chairman John Larson (D-CT) was resolute that Pelosi would secure the votes.

     

    “I feel very confident that we’re there and tomorrow evening, we’ll be celebrating a great victory,” said Larson.

     

    Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) serves as special assistant to Pelosi. And he wasn’t as sure as Larson.

     

    “We’re in shooting distance,” Van Hollen declared.

     

    I pressed Van Hollen about whether Democrats were ready to bring the bill to the floor and try to gin up the necessary support during the vote.

     

    “You don’t want to roll the dice on that,” Van Hollen said. “This is too important.”

     

    As Friday afternoon dissolved into evening, the House Rules Committee met in a seemingly-interminable session.

     

    The Rules panel serves as a gateway to the House floor. Almost every piece of legislation must first get a “rule” from the committee. The rule establishes parameters for how the House will handle a measure on the floor. If you don’t get a rule, you can’t debate the bill.

     

    Members of the Rules Committee peppered the Democratic authors of the bill with questions in the cramped hearing room. Hours of this interrogation exasperated House Education and Labor Committee Chairman George Miller (D-CA).

     

    “We’re thinking of renaming this committee Guantanamo,” Miller sighed at the five hour mark in the meeting.

     

    “It’s worse than Guantanamo,” blurted Rep. Dennis Cardoza (D-CA).

     

    - Chad Pergram covers Congress for FOX News. He’s won an Edward R. Murrow Award and the Joan Barone Award for his reporting on Capitol Hill.

     

    - The Speaker’s Lobby refers to a long, ornate hallway that runs behind the House chamber. Lawmakers, aides and journalists often confer there during votes.

Dave

Bravo for some legislators who have the backbone to stop an injustice to taxpayers. The paper industry "black liquor" tax credit is a shame and a sneaky backdoor loophole to evade billions in taxes. The black liquor process is self-sustaining and the industry is adding unneeded fossil fuel in order to "qualify" the black liquor as an alternative fuel. Not only are they trying to avoid taxes, they increase the demand for fossil fuel and add to the greenhouse gas problem. The loophole...

November 11, 2009 at 4:46 pm

Troy Haire

"Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just." Thomas Jefferson I can't believe the turn of events that have recently taken place in our government. I've watched congress for some time in disbelief! They have blantantly ignored the wishes of the citizens that voted them into office! It feels like they have stopped listening and decided to just do whatever they want. That's not what they are there for! I'm scared when i think about what is going on in...

November 9, 2009 at 8:21 pm

Julie B

Don't these idiot Demcrats realize that they have lost a whole lot of Democratic votes today? 68% of us are against illegal immigration and amnesty, yet they are making it easy for illegal to get into our healtcare system and create a draw for even more illegal workers to come here. 17% of us are without jobs and have lost hope in our country. Do we need to remind our leaders that they are are working for us? Americans are being overlooked to make things easier for those who are here...

November 9, 2009 at 7:58 pm

Jack

While the bill may not be exactly what is needed, at least it is a start. If we had been able to come together and talk through issues, it may have been more bi-partisan. As it is, the tea baggers left the right with no choice but to aviod the bill at all costs. This is politics: circa 2009

November 9, 2009 at 1:17 pm

Jarilyn Daigle

This country is trillions of dollars in debt! The idea that we are going to go into debt trillions of dollars more for health care is just incomprehensible. What is the matter with all those democrats. They do not have the American people in mind. WE CANNOT AFFORD THIS. The bill they have is a BIG mess. It is criminal what they are doing and absolutely unconstitutional. I am just outraged over what is going on in Congress and I hope that everyone who voted yes in the house are thrown...

November 9, 2009 at 12:25 pm

John

The proposed health bill is a disgrace. We need something, but not this Nancy Pelosi garbage. The Democrats need to re-name their party. How about the "New American Comunist Party". I am so ashamed of them it's not funny. You can bet that in 2010 I will be with my fellow Americans to drive the Democrats out of office, even though I'm an Independant voter. They don't get it and they don't care about their country. They are only interested in their Idealism. They may have control of...

November 8, 2009 at 11:53 am

Christine Wheeler

Here, again, is a perfect example of how out of touch Congress is. Nancy Pelosi is a pathetic excuse of a human being, as is Harry Reed. What is it going to take for Americans to get smart and vote every one of the people currently in Congress out of office? Isn't is obvious they truly think they know what is best for us, rather that LISTENING to us? I think term limits for Congress are the only answer to stop these loons, and we all know that will NEVER happen. They like all their...

November 8, 2009 at 10:07 am

patricia fry

I'm glad The Speaker is interested in bringing together the Eastern Catholics and the Roman Catholics. Does she know that the people working on the problem are those that believe the solution is in finding what each has in common. Maybe, I hope maybe she does know. It would be nice if she is in a learning period as how to do such a great thing of finding what we all have in common and using that as a starting point in all aspects of Government.

November 7, 2009 at 7:10 pm

Marianna

The Orthodox church did not split from the Catholic church in 1054, it was the other way around when the Catholic Bishop of Rome (the pope) declared himself as infallible and added the philioque. The Orthodox church has maintained the same beliefs since the establishment of Orthodoxy. The changes that followed in the Catholic church to further the split are what spurred on the reformation. There have been no reformations or splits in the Orthodox church since 1054. The Orthodox still hold...

November 7, 2009 at 4:41 pm

Skipcat445

What is a biofuel credit doing in a Healthcare bill? I thought this was all about providing healthcare for Americans. They are taking away a credit for use of secondary bio-fuel usage to cover the cost of this monstrousity? So what do they do about black liquor then?

November 7, 2009 at 12:51 pm

Start a new Discussion

Name
* required

Email
* required
* not displayed

Comment

Characters used : 0/500
Notify me of follow-up comments via email Start Discussion